Hi, Usually there is a reference to a Impl classID so the CA knows what to function/class to call when generating this part of the cert. For my system (built on Redhat CS 8.0 instead of dogtag but those codebases are very similar) I have this in my cert profiles and it generates the Crl dp entry in the cert without errors. policyset.userCertSet.13.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl policyset.userCertSet.13constraint.name=No Constraint policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul tImpl policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points Extension Default policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl I don't believe you need to specify the No Constraint fields, as I just have them in there if later I wanted to enforce a specific CRL distribution point, it would require less updates to the profile. This line here is the one I think you need. policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul tImpl As it tells the CA what class to call into when generating this part of the cert. I don't think this is needed either, but it was in the example certs from the CS 8.0 install so I left it. policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 I presume it is just letting the CA know after you added one CRL to the cert you can move on but I have dug into the code to find out. Sean This message and/or attachments may include information subject to GDC4S O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message. -----Original Message----- From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Frederic d'Huart Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM To: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error Hello Pki users, Section B.1.4. of the RH admin guide refers to the following acceptable values for crlDistributionPoint Type: DirectoryName URIName RelativeToIssuer Using PKIConsole, I have added to the caUserCert profile a policy for include a CDP as follow: policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points Extension Default policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0= after profile re-activated, and new request generated, I get the following error on the agent interface: The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error. Error Message: /java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension/ Please contact your local administrator for assistance. Any Ideas what could be wrong ? Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pki-users mailing list Pki-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users

Hi, Usually there is a reference to a Impl classID so the CA knows

to function/class to call when generating this part of the cert. For my system (built on Redhat CS 8.0 instead of dogtag but those codebases are very similar) I have this in my cert profiles and it generates the Crl dp entry in the cert without errors. policyset.userCertSet.13.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl policyset.userCertSet.13constraint.name=No Constraint

tImpl policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points

Default policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true

xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl I don't believe you need to specify the No Constraint fields, as I

have them in there if later I wanted to enforce a specific CRL distribution point, it would require less updates to the profile. This line here is the one I think you need.

tImpl As it tells the CA what class to call into when generating this part

the cert. I don't think this is needed either, but it was in the example certs from the CS 8.0 install so I left it. policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 I presume it is just letting the CA know after you added one CRL to

cert you can move on but I have dug into the code to find out. Sean This message and/or attachments may include information subject to

O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized

use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies

the original message. -----Original Message----- From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com

On Behalf Of Frederic d'Huart Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM To: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error Hello Pki users, Section B.1.4. of the RH admin guide refers to the following

values for crlDistributionPoint Type: DirectoryName URIName RelativeToIssuer Using PKIConsole, I have added to the caUserCert profile a policy for include a CDP as follow: policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points

Default policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true

Hi, We seem to have a similar or the same problem as was described in October 2010. I couldn't find any resolution to the problem in the archives. Description of our problem: In Dogtag, addition of CDP extension in enrollment profile corrupts request. Where it does work: RHEL5(x64)/CS 8.0/java 1.6.0_21-b06 --------------------------------------------------- In the profile the following entry adds the extension: policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.name=No Constraint policyset.userCertSet.10.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaultImpl policyset.userCertSet.10.default.name=CRL Distribution Points Extension Default policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerName_0= policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerType_0= policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http://p... policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0= After "submit" is pushed during enrollment, the following appears in the debug log: [02/Mar/2011:13:34:33][http-9180-Processor19]: EnrollProfile certInfo : [ Version: V3 Subject: UID=test 99 Signature Algorithm: SHA1withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.5 Key: algorithm = RSA, unparsed keybits = ... blahh blahh ... Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false AuthInfoAccess [ (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp] Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true KeyUsage [ DigitalSignature Non_repudiation Key_Encipherment ] Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false SubjectAlternativeName [ [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test99(a)domain.net]] Extension[5] = CRLDistributionPoints ] The request is approved normally and the extension appears in the certificate: Identifier: CRL Distribution Points - 2.5.29.31 Critical: no Number of Points: 1 Point 0 Distribution Point: [URIName: http://publish.net/crl/foobar/MasterCRL.crl] Where it doesn't work: RHEL5(x64)/Dogtag - pki-ca-1.3.6-1.el5/java(1.6.0_21-b06 and 1.6.0_24-b07) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here, a failure appears already in the debug log after submitting the request: Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false AuthInfoAccess [ (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp] Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true KeyUsage [ DigitalSignature Non_repudiation Key_Encipherment ] Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false SubjectAlternativeName [ [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test100(a)domain.net]] Extension[5] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.31 Criticality=false Extension unknown: DER encoded OCTET string = 04 44 30 42 30 40 A0 3E A0 3C 86 3A 68 74 74 70 3A 2F 2F 70 75 62 6C 69 73 68 2E 70 6B 69 2E 65 72 73 74 65 2D 67 72 6F 75 70 2E 6E 65 74 2F 63 72 6C 2F 70 69 6C 6F 74 2F 4D 61 73 74 65 72 43 52 4C 2E 63 72 6C ] NOTE: Extension[5]'s OID isn't recognized -- "Extension unknown"?? Then during approval, the java error appears: The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error. Error Message: java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension Please contact your local administrator for assistance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It doesn't depend on the java version - two versions result in the same error. addition of the (semi-documented?) parameter "crlDistPointsNum=1" does not fix the problem. Any ideas what the problem could be are greatly appreciated. We can't be the only ones with a CDP in the certificates. Could anyone show me a working profile? thanks in advance, Bill -----Original Message----- From: Elliott William C OSS sIT Sent: Montag, 28. Februar 2011 15:06 To: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: RE: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur] Hallo, I have exactly the same problem described in October in the Pki-users mailing list. In the list, there is no resolution. Was someone able to work around the problem? We are running Dogtag on RHEL5 64-bit. The beautiful thing is, the profile works in RH CS 8.0, but throws the java error with Dogtag. The java is slightly newer on the Dogtag system: 1.6.0_24 (where the error occurs) vs. 1.6.0_21 on the CS 8.0. Dogtag version is pki-common-1.3.8-1.el5. Any Ideas? Thanks in advance, Bill -----Original Message----- From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of sean.veale(a)gdc4s.com Sent: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 15:21 To: fdh(a)x-zone.org Cc: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur] Hi I'm using RH Enterprise Linux 5.3 Java -version gives Java Version "1.6.0.0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (rhel-1.11.b16.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64 Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) Looks like I'm running a slightly older version of the OpenJDK vm, and I'm on a 64 bit platform instead of the 32 bit one you are on. A red-hat rep would have to weigh in if either would be significant in this case. Sean On 10/22/2010 03:14 PM, sean.veale(a)gdc4s.com wrote: > Hi, Usually there is a reference to a Impl classID so the CA knows > what > to function/class to call when generating this part of the cert. > > For my system (built on Redhat CS 8.0 instead of dogtag but those > codebases are very similar) I have this in my cert profiles and it > generates the Crl dp entry in the cert without errors. > > policyset.userCertSet.13.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl > policyset.userCertSet.13constraint.name=No Constraint > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul > tImpl > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points > Extension > Default > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// > xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl > > > I don't believe you need to specify the No Constraint fields, as I > just > have them in there if later I wanted to enforce a specific CRL > distribution point, it would require less updates to the profile. > > This line here is the one I think you need. > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul > tImpl > > As it tells the CA what class to call into when generating this part > of > the cert. > > I don't think this is needed either, but it was in the example certs > from the CS 8.0 install so I left it. > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 > > I presume it is just letting the CA know after you added one CRL to > the > cert you can move on but I have dug into the code to find out. > > Sean > > > This message and/or attachments may include information subject to > GDC4S > O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be > accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission > are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual > restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the > policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized > review, > use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an > intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies > of > the original message. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com > [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Frederic d'Huart > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM > To: pki-users(a)redhat.com > Subject: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: > Type_0 : URIName error > > Hello Pki users, > > > Section B.1.4. of the RH admin guide refers to the following > acceptable > values > for crlDistributionPoint Type: > > DirectoryName > URIName > RelativeToIssuer > > > > Using PKIConsole, I have added to the caUserCert profile a policy for > include a CDP as follow: > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points > Extension > Default > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// > xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0= > > after profile re-activated, and new request generated, I get the > following error on the agent interface: > > The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error. > > Error Message: > /java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot > be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension/ > > Please contact your local administrator for assistance. > > > Any Ideas what could be wrong ? > > > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pki-users mailing list > Pki-users(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users > > _______________________________________________ Pki-users mailing list Pki-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users _______________________________________________ Pki-users mailing list Pki-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users

Hi, We seem to have a similar or the same problem as was described in October 2010. I couldn't find any resolution to the problem in the archives. Description of our problem: In Dogtag, addition of CDP extension in enrollment profile corrupts request. Where it does work: RHEL5(x64)/CS 8.0/java 1.6.0_21-b06 --------------------------------------------------- In the profile the following entry adds the extension: policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.name=No Constraint policyset.userCertSet.10.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaultImpl policyset.userCertSet.10.default.name=CRL Distribution Points Extension Default policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerName_0= policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerType_0= policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http://p... policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0= After "submit" is pushed during enrollment, the following appears in the debug log: [02/Mar/2011:13:34:33][http-9180-Processor19]: EnrollProfile certInfo : [ Version: V3 Subject: UID=test 99 Signature Algorithm: SHA1withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.5 Key: algorithm = RSA, unparsed keybits = ... blahh blahh ... Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false AuthInfoAccess [ (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp] Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true KeyUsage [ DigitalSignature Non_repudiation Key_Encipherment ] Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false SubjectAlternativeName [ [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test99(a)domain.net]] Extension[5] = CRLDistributionPoints ] The request is approved normally and the extension appears in the certificate: Identifier: CRL Distribution Points - 2.5.29.31 Critical: no Number of Points: 1 Point 0 Distribution Point: [URIName: http://publish.net/crl/foobar/MasterCRL.crl] Where it doesn't work: RHEL5(x64)/Dogtag - pki-ca-1.3.6-1.el5/java(1.6.0_21-b06 and 1.6.0_24-b07) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here, a failure appears already in the debug log after submitting the request: Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false AuthInfoAccess [ (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp] Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true KeyUsage [ DigitalSignature Non_repudiation Key_Encipherment ] Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false SubjectAlternativeName [ [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test100(a)domain.net]] Extension[5] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.31 Criticality=false Extension unknown: DER encoded OCTET string = 04 44 30 42 30 40 A0 3E A0 3C 86 3A 68 74 74 70 3A 2F 2F 70 75 62 6C 69 73 68 2E 70 6B 69 2E 65 72 73 74 65 2D 67 72 6F 75 70 2E 6E 65 74 2F 63 72 6C 2F 70 69 6C 6F 74 2F 4D 61 73 74 65 72 43 52 4C 2E 63 72 6C ] NOTE: Extension[5]'s OID isn't recognized -- "Extension unknown"?? Then during approval, the java error appears: The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error. Error Message: java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension Please contact your local administrator for assistance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It doesn't depend on the java version - two versions result in the same error. addition of the (semi-documented?) parameter "crlDistPointsNum=1" does not fix the problem. Any ideas what the problem could be are greatly appreciated. We can't be the only ones with a CDP in the certificates. Could anyone show me a working profile? thanks in advance, Bill -----Original Message----- From: Elliott William C OSS sIT Sent: Montag, 28. Februar 2011 15:06 To: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: RE: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur] Hallo, I have exactly the same problem described in October in the Pki-users mailing list. In the list, there is no resolution. Was someone able to work around the problem? We are running Dogtag on RHEL5 64-bit. The beautiful thing is, the profile works in RH CS 8.0, but throws the java error with Dogtag. The java is slightly newer on the Dogtag system: 1.6.0_24 (where the error occurs) vs. 1.6.0_21 on the CS 8.0. Dogtag version is pki-common-1.3.8-1.el5. Any Ideas? Thanks in advance, Bill -----Original Message----- From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of sean.veale(a)gdc4s.com Sent: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 15:21 To: fdh(a)x-zone.org Cc: pki-users(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur] Hi I'm using RH Enterprise Linux 5.3 Java -version gives Java Version "1.6.0.0" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (rhel-1.11.b16.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64 Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) Looks like I'm running a slightly older version of the OpenJDK vm, and I'm on a 64 bit platform instead of the 32 bit one you are on. A red-hat rep would have to weigh in if either would be significant in this case. Sean On 10/22/2010 03:14 PM, sean.veale(a)gdc4s.com wrote: > Hi, Usually there is a reference to a Impl classID so the CA knows > what > to function/class to call when generating this part of the cert. > > For my system (built on Redhat CS 8.0 instead of dogtag but those > codebases are very similar) I have this in my cert profiles and it > generates the Crl dp entry in the cert without errors. > > policyset.userCertSet.13.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl > policyset.userCertSet.13constraint.name=No Constraint > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul > tImpl > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points > Extension > Default > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// > xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl > > > I don't believe you need to specify the No Constraint fields, as I > just > have them in there if later I wanted to enforce a specific CRL > distribution point, it would require less updates to the profile. > > This line here is the one I think you need. > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul > tImpl > > As it tells the CA what class to call into when generating this part > of > the cert. > > I don't think this is needed either, but it was in the example certs > from the CS 8.0 install so I left it. > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1 > > I presume it is just letting the CA know after you added one CRL to > the > cert you can move on but I have dug into the code to find out. > > Sean > > > This message and/or attachments may include information subject to > GDC4S > O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be > accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission > are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual > restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the > policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized > review, > use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an > intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies > of > the original message. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com > [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Frederic d'Huart > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM > To: pki-users(a)redhat.com > Subject: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: > Type_0 : URIName error > > Hello Pki users, > > > Section B.1.4. of the RH admin guide refers to the following > acceptable > values > for crlDistributionPoint Type: > > DirectoryName > URIName > RelativeToIssuer > > > > Using PKIConsole, I have added to the caUserCert profile a policy for > include a CDP as follow: > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points > Extension > Default > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true > > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http:// > xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl > policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0= > > after profile re-activated, and new request generated, I get the > following error on the agent interface: > > The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error. > > Error Message: > /java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot > be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension/ > > Please contact your local administrator for assistance. > > > Any Ideas what could be wrong ? > > > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pki-users mailing list > Pki-users(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users > > _______________________________________________ Pki-users mailing list Pki-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users _______________________________________________ Pki-users mailing list Pki-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users