oh, and I forgot to mention that I submitted the revocation request
through EE CMC revocation (on an RHCS 8.1 CA instance) and the
certificate was promptly revoked.
Christina
On 09/25/2012 08:46 PM, Christina Fu wrote:
Hi Jamil,
I tried to reproduce your issue, but I seemed to be able to generate
CMC revocation request with SHA-256 digest. I have to admit that my
main development machine is RHEL and I work on RHCS8.1 tree.
I changed all "SHA1" to "SHA256" in CMCRevoke.java (with the
exception
with DSA), compiled, and it just worked. Did you do anything different?
I could see in dumpasn1 where SHA245 is in place:
C-Sequence (13)
Object Identifier (9)
1 2 840 113549 1 1 11 (PKCS #1 SHA-256 With RSA Encryption)
NULL (0)
Christina
On 09/19/2012 11:19 AM, Christina Fu wrote:
> Hi Jamil,
>
> We made an effort to support SHA2 where we can but might have missed
> a few places. I'll look into this and hopefully be able to get back
> to you in a few days.
>
> thanks,
> Christina
>
> On 09/19/2012 12:44 AM, Nimeh, Jamil wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dogtag Gurus,
>>
>> I have been trying to issue CMC revocation messages signed with
>> SHA-256, but the server fails to validate the message in the CMCAuth
>> java policy module. If I leave all fields the same but change the
>> signature algorithm to SHA-1 then everything seems to work fine.
>>
>> I suspect this is another side-effect of the root-cause for bug
>> 824624. It seems like in certain cases with JSS 4.2.6 when PKCS#7
>> messages are created using any of the SHA-2 variants, the OIDs get
>> messed up. This happened with SCEP responses from the CA (the bug
>> referenced above) and I had it happen with the CMC revoke
>> modifications I made. The latter issue was fixed by pulling down
>> JSS 4.3 and loading that jar in the classpath for the modified
>> CMCRevoke tool. However, on the server side I ended up seeing
>> verification failures.
>>
>> I'm running pki-common-9.0.20, jss 4.2.6, and NSS 3.13.4. At one
>> point I had heard that Dogtag 9.0.X wasn't 100% safe to run with JSS
>> 4.3 or later. Is that still the case with the latest 9.0 packages?
>>
>>
>> Has anyone had any success generating these CMC messages using SHA-2
>> hash algs and getting Dogtag to accept them?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jamil
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pki-users mailing list
>> Pki-users(a)redhat.com
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-users mailing list
> Pki-users(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users