Thanks fo clue. RMFPopClientTool is a cli tool. I check implementation and
I found this method wrapPrivateKey(...).
Can it be used to wrap private key which could be added to
CertEnrollRequest to request certificate from my rest client?
And do You have ideas how to get symmetric key for that? I think better
solution would be use CA public key to encrypt it but I don't have that
much knowlege in PKI and Dogtag architecture.
2015-10-14 19:25 GMT+02:00 John Magne <jmagne(a)redhat.com>:
If you see the email I sent the other day,
we make use of the CRMFPopClient tool that uses the transport key to wrap
the private key.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcin Mierzejewski" <marcinmierzejewski1024(a)gmail.com>
To: "Dave Sirrine" <dsirrine(a)redhat.com>
Cc: pki-users(a)redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 2:35:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Pki-users] Dogtag profile for encryption certificate with
storing private key in DRM/KRA
But after this change it is not adding private key to DRM: /
2015-10-13 19:27 GMT+02:00 Dave Sirrine < dsirrine(a)redhat.com > :
Marcin,
Not sure what exactly you're looking for here, but the beauty of profiles
is you can create your own. If the ECC profile works as you would expect,
you can always create a copy with a new name and change the appropriate
lines. A quick diff of the two profiles you mention shows that there's not
a lot that's different between the two:
diff caEncECUserCert.cfg caEncUserCert.cfg
1c1
< desc=This certificate profile is for enrolling user ECC encryption
certificates. It works only with latest Firefox.
---
> desc=This certificate profile is for enrolling user encryption
certificates with option to archive keys.
5c5
< name=Manual User Encryption ECC Certificates Enrollment
---
> name=Manual User Encryption Certificates Enrollment
7,8c7,10
< input.list=i1
< input.i1.class_id=encKeyGenInputImpl
---
> input.list=i1,i2,i3
> input.i1.class_id=certReqInputImpl
> input.i2.class_id=subjectNameInputImpl
> input.i3.class_id=submitterInfoInputImpl
31,32c33,34
< policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyType=EC
<
policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyParameters=nistp256,nistp521
---
> policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyType=RSA
>
policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyParameters=1024,2048,3072,4096
93a96
>
In theory (I have not tested this) you should be able to change the lines
for 'policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyType' and
'policyset.encryptionCertSet.3.constraint.params.keyParameters' to match
the caEncUserCert.cfg profile and keep everything else the same. If you
have the KRA installed and configured to work with your CA, the encryption
keys should automatically be archived in the KRA.
-- Dave
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Marcin Mierzejewski <
marcinmierzejewski1024(a)gmail.com > wrote:
there is a caEncECUserCert that works as I expect but generates Eliptic
curve certificate. Is there any eqiuvalent for RSA? And next question is:
could I use this profile to generate enduser certificate remote by calling
REST service?
2015-10-13 15:51 GMT+02:00 Marcin Mierzejewski <
marcinmierzejewski1024(a)gmail.com > :
Hi All,
What I want is simple profile for requesting encryption(not sign) personal
certificate that will private key be stored in KRA/DRM. I check existing
profiles and found profile that name and description meet the goals I want
to achieve.
CaEncUserCert.cfg
this profile was not visible I change that. I opened this profile in end
user CA application
Certificate Profile - Manual User Encryption Certificates Enrollment
This certificate profile is for enrolling user encryption certificates
with option to archive keys. Certificate Request Input
* Certificate Request Type list ( pcks10 or crmf)
* Certificate Request (text area for request)
Subject Name
-fields with info about user(propably should be same values that were in
certificate request)
Requestor Information
- info about requestor
How it's possible to store private key without even sending it to CA? can
be private key enclosed into "Certificate Request"? If answer is no - as I
think why there is a "option to archieve keys"?
Marcin
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users