Jack, you might have missed this, but could you please give description 
to each parameter to
safe_injection_strcat() in the comment at top?
For comment style, there are some examples in the same file, such as 
get_post_field().
conditional ACK.
thanks!
Christina
On 10/23/2012 01:47 PM, John Magne wrote:
 Portion of patch, to address cfu's issues:
 cfu, please review.
 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=632378&action=edit
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Christina Fu"<cfu(a)redhat.com>
 To: pki-devel(a)redhat.com
 Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:53:33 AM
 Subject: Re: [Pki-devel] Review Request
 The following are my review comments:
 - I see you replaced the PL_strcat() calls in mod_tokendb.cpp.  How
 about the other PL_strcat() calls in other files? Do they not present
 any issue?
 - The following RA::Debug() message and comment seems a bit confusing
 for me as it seems to declare that it's about to truncate and yet it's
 actually trying to resize:
 A::Debug( "safe_injection_strcat, about to truncate, resize injection
 buffer:  ", "current len: %d expected_len %d data_len: %d
 cur_injection_size %d",current_len, expected_len, cat_data_len,
 *injection_size );
 /* We are going to get truncated!
 How about say something like "...resizing to avoid truncation..."
 - safe_injection_strcat()
 not sure of the role of the variable "result" as it only gets set once
 at the end, but returned many times in the middle. Unclear if 1 is
 success or 0 is. There is no comment (yeah, could you please provide
 comment for parameters and return value?). It is especially confusing
 when check_injection_size() comment says "returns 0 on success, 1 on
 failure" and yet safe_injection_strcat() has "if (check_res == 1),
 return result", where result was init'd to be 0,  So does that mean it
 is the opposite of the check_injection_size()?
 Another thing is the callers ignore the return values from
 safe_injection_strcat() anyway, so why return anything at all?
 - Why only call check_injection_size 2nd time if still not enough?
 Christina
 On 10/22/2012 02:54 PM, John Magne wrote:
> Request review for issue:
>
>
> Bug 864607 - Empty certificate search in TPS results in httpd.worker segmentation
fault then server error.
>
> Bugzilla:
> 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864607
>
> Attachment:
>
> 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=630239&action=diff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
> 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
 _______________________________________________
 Pki-devel mailing list
 Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel