On 11/16/2011 10:38 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 09:48 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
>> I'm struggling with the premise behind this patch. Some of these
>> methods seem like they are valuable - and certainly they were valuable
>> at some point in time (or they would not have been written). On the
>> other hand, I see the benefit of trimming the code base. No need to
>> refactor code that isn't being used.
>>
>> I realize that this removes some eclipse warnings, but is removing
>> these
>> methods good practice?
>>
>> I guess I'm looking for some other folks to chime in here.
>
> My feeling is that you do not leave dead code in the code base. The
> code still exists in the repository, but it is unlikely that a piece
> of code that is not called today will be needed in exactly the same
> form in the future.
>
>
> Code is documentation. Code that is not used is misleading to the
> maintainer. Committing commented out code is a bad practice.
>
> As we refactor, the location of the behavior of a lot of these
> methods will change. Thus, some orphan calls will become
> uncallable, and others will get in the way of code clean up.
>
>
> This is old code: some of it goes back 15 years. Holding on to
> unused, uncallable code is akin to hoarding.
>
>
>>
>> Ade
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 22:29 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pki-devel mailing list
>>> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
Conflicted with the PKI Silent changes, so patch has been remade by
hand.
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel Withdrawn., The formatting
changes make it impractical to try and
reformat this. Will be resubmitted in smaller patches shortly.