On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 05:11:46PM -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 5/6/2015 11:49 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>>>For #32, I don't think we should use X500Name since this is a generic
LDAP
>>>DN, not necessarily a DN in a certificate. There may be multiple CN's in
a
>>>generic DN (e.g. cn=...,cn=...,dc=example,dc=com).
>>>
>>>Probably it should be like this:
>>>
>>> // assuming DN: cn=<profileId>,...
>>> profileId = LDAPDN.explodeDN(dn, true)[0];
>>>
>>New patch #32 attached.
>>
>ping
Sorry, missed this one. ACK.
Thanks! Pushed to master (398aa8a).
--
Endi S. Dewata