8 May
2015
8 May
'15
12:54 a.m.
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 05:11:46PM -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 5/6/2015 11:49 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
For #32, I don't think we should use X500Name since this is a generic LDAP DN, not necessarily a DN in a certificate. There may be multiple CN's in a generic DN (e.g. cn=...,cn=...,dc=example,dc=com).
Probably it should be like this:
// assuming DN: cn=<profileId>,... profileId = LDAPDN.explodeDN(dn, true)[0];
New patch #32 attached.
ping
Sorry, missed this one. ACK.
Thanks! Pushed to master (398aa8a).
-- Endi S. Dewata