12:50 p.m.
The pki-common package has been split such that the common and
client binaries are packaged in pki-base and server binaries are
packaged in pki-server. The pki-util has been merged into pki-base
and the pki-deploy package has been merged into pki-server.
Ticket #295
--
Endi S. Dewata
2:02 p.m.
On 8/20/2012 12:50 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
The pki-common package has been split such that the common and
client binaries are packaged in pki-base and server binaries are
packaged in pki-server. The pki-util has been merged into pki-base
and the pki-deploy package has been merged into pki-server.
Ticket #295
New patch attached. The old package definition wasn't removed properly.
--
Endi S. Dewata
7:04 p.m.
On 8/21/2012 2:02 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 8/20/2012 12:50 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> The pki-common package has been split such that the common and
> client binaries are packaged in pki-base and server binaries are
> packaged in pki-server. The pki-util has been merged into pki-base
> and the pki-deploy package has been merged into pki-server.
>
> Ticket #295
New patch attached. The old package definition wasn't removed properly.
New patch attached. Updated pki-console.spec, dogtag-pki.spec, and some
other files.
--
Endi S. Dewata
10:26 p.m.
1. As discussed on #irc, please add a patch to handle the javadoc
packages.
2. How did you determine the Requires for pki-base? We do not want to
install more than is necessary on a client. For example, it isn't clear
to me that jython should be a requirement for pki-base. Rather it
should have been a requirement for pki-deploy - which becomes part of
pki-server.
Similarly the following seem to be requirements for pki-server rather
than pki-base: pki-common-theme, velocity, tomcatjss, pki-symkey,
(jss?)
3. The following should probably be replaced by packages (if possible):
Requires: %{_javadir}/velocity.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xalan-j2.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xalan-j2-serializer.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xerces-j2.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xml-commons-apis.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xml-commons-resolver.jar
And then we should ask whether they are requirements for pki-base or
pki-server.
4. pki-symkey: I know we said this will likely eventually be folded into
jss. But this is only used by the tks. So it should be a requirement
for either pki-server or pki-tks.
5. Its also an interesting question as to whether velocity is in fact a
requirement for the *-theme packages, rather than pki-server.
Ade
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 19:04 -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 8/21/2012 2:02 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> On 8/20/2012 12:50 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
>> The pki-common package has been split such that the common and
>> client binaries are packaged in pki-base and server binaries are
>> packaged in pki-server. The pki-util has been merged into pki-base
>> and the pki-deploy package has been merged into pki-server.
>>
>> Ticket #295
>
> New patch attached. The old package definition wasn't removed properly.
New patch attached. Updated pki-console.spec, dogtag-pki.spec, and some
other files.
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
3:02 p.m.
On 8/27/2012 10:26 PM, Ade Lee wrote:
1. As discussed on #irc, please add a patch to handle the javadoc
packages.
I opened a ticket for this:
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/305
2. How did you determine the Requires for pki-base? We do not want
to
install more than is necessary on a client. For example, it isn't clear
to me that jython should be a requirement for pki-base. Rather it
should have been a requirement for pki-deploy - which becomes part of
pki-server.
The original pki-common's Requires were split for pki-base (combined
with pki-util) and pki-server. Ideally all server-specific Requires
should go to pki-server. But it's difficult to make a clean split
without inspecting the code and running tests. So this patch contains a
pretty safe split, the pki-base may contain more than required, but it
wouldn't hurt and can be refined again.
Similarly the following seem to be requirements for pki-server
rather
than pki-base: pki-common-theme, velocity, tomcatjss, pki-symkey,
(jss?)
OK, I'll move the Requires as follows:
* pki-common-theme, velocity, & tomcatjss ==> pki-server
* pki-symkey ==> pki-tks
Should we rename pki-common-theme to pki-server-theme?
The jss will stay in pki-base because it's required by the clients.
3. The following should probably be replaced by packages (if
possible):
Requires: %{_javadir}/velocity.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xalan-j2.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xalan-j2-serializer.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xerces-j2.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xml-commons-apis.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/xml-commons-resolver.jar
This is an existing issue, it should be addressed separately:
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/306
And then we should ask whether they are requirements for pki-base or
pki-server.
I'll move the velocity.jar to pki-server, but the rest might have to
wait. Those XML libraries could be needed indirectly by pki-base.
4. pki-symkey: I know we said this will likely eventually be folded
into
jss. But this is only used by the tks. So it should be a requirement
for either pki-server or pki-tks.
Yes, this goes to pki-tks and we'll remove it once it's merged into jss.
5. Its also an interesting question as to whether velocity is in
fact a
requirement for the *-theme packages, rather than pki-server.
To my understanding the themes only contain velocity scripts and we only
need the velocity.jar when the server runs it.
I'll post a revised patch with these changes.
--
Endi S. Dewata
4497
days inactive
4507
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Ade Lee -
Endi Sukma Dewata