Re: [Pki-devel] Request for better Dogtag 10 terminology . . .
On 05/10/2012 08:02 PM, Matthew Harmsen wrote:
As initially stated, we would like to replace the
*"[instance]"*
notation and *"PKI instance"* terminology currently used within
Dogtag 10 with something that is more descriptive and more accurate.
While several alternatives have already been suggested, none have
gained wide-spread acceptance:
Actually I think the term "instance" is descriptive and accurate, it
makes perfect sense to me in the context of how it's being used. Terms
like cluster, domain, realm, group, etc. have so many other connotations
I think it would be more confusing because it implies something it's not.
--
John Dennis <jdennis(a)redhat.com>
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/