On 5/6/2015 11:49 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>> For #32, I don't think we should use X500Name since this
is a generic LDAP
>> DN, not necessarily a DN in a certificate. There may be multiple CN's in a
>> generic DN (e.g. cn=...,cn=...,dc=example,dc=com).
>>
>> Probably it should be like this:
>>
>> // assuming DN: cn=<profileId>,...
>> profileId = LDAPDN.explodeDN(dn, true)[0];
>>
> New patch #32 attached.
>
ping
Sorry, missed this one. ACK.
--
Endi S. Dewata