On Apr 4, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Matthew Harmsen wrote:
Adam,
Was there a typo in your subject line --- Did you actually mean Fedora 16 instead of
Fedora 18 (rawhide)?
If you did mean Fedora 16, Endi and Adi made some recent changes which remove the need
for the "candlepin-deps", but require the following:
On 3/27/2012 8:57 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> On 3/27/2012 5:20 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
>> Previously the code depends on the old RESTEasy libraries provided by
>> Candlepin package. Now the Eclipse classpath, build/setup scripts, and
>> the spec file have been updated to use the libraries provided by the
>> new RESTEasy package.
>>
>> Ticket #29
>>
>> Note: The new RESTEasy package is only available in F17.
>
> Rebased.
I revised the patch such that in older Fedora it will not require the new RESTEasy
package. Instead, you can download RESTEasy 2.3.2 (must be this version) zip file, install
it somewhere, and create the following symlinks to mimic F17:
/usr/share/java/glassfish-jaxb/jaxb-impl.jar
/usr/share/java/resteasy/jaxrs-api.jar
/usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jaxb-provider.jar
/usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jaxrs.jar
/usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jettison-provider.jar
/usr/share/java/scannotation.jar
This way we can continue the development on F16 without having to officially support it.
I believe that you can download this from the following link (wait for the download link
to appear):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/resteasy/files/Resteasy%20JAX-RS/2.3.2.Fi...
I believe that Kevin may be able to point you to an existing Repo for the other
components?
Hope this helps,
-- Matt
Matt,
The only problem with this is that the nightly builds are using mock (as are the builds
done in Westford, AFAIK). Mock builds just pull from a mock repo and don't allow you
to do this type of manipulation--at least not in any type of automated fashion. If someone
can provide me with an rpm that includes these hacks, I can put them in a extras repo and
pull from that. This hack would allow me to continue with the daily F16 builds otherwise I
think we should discontinue them since Dogtag 10 will never be released on F16.
--Kevin
On 04/02/12 19:13, Adam Young wrote:
>
> Please make a single directory with the set of RPMs needed for BUilding Dogtag.
We've been doing that for IPA for a while, and it is necessary for continuing
development. I am not at a point where I can install F17 for my primary development
machine, but I still try to keep up with PKI development from time to time. You guys
have done a great job in geting the RPMS into Rawhide, but they should still install on
F16 provided all of the dependencies are provided. I am willing to generate the Repo the
same way that John Dennis does for IPA, but I need the RPMS themselves.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel