On 01/19/2012 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
I don't think that this is correct. There is functionality and
critical bug fixing going on in the Dogtag 9 branch that we definitely
want to get into master. It needs to get there somehow. Of course
there may be work that is not needed on master due to refactoring, but
that needs to be determined on a patch-by-patch basis.
If the concern is changes causing rebase headaches for Endi and Ade,
then we could use a gatekeeper approach, but I haven't seen the need
for that.
-NGK
You've probably cleared this up, but: I think that chagnes going on in
9 are going to need formatting aligned with the Master branch before
they can be pushed. Ade had suggested that the approach would involve
formatting in the 9 series before pushing changes, but I am not sure if
this is going to work across the board any way. I assume that fixes
going into the 9 series wil lbe small enough patches that they can be
had merged into master.