Re: [Pki-devel] Repo with the F18 dependencies needed to build Dogtag

On Apr 4, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Matthew Harmsen wrote: > Adam, > > Was there a typo in your subject line --- Did you actually mean > /*Fedora 16*/ instead of /*Fedora 18 (rawhide)*/? > > If you did mean Fedora 16, Endi and Adi made some recent changes > which remove the need for the "candlepin-deps", but require the > following: > > On 3/27/2012 8:57 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: >> On 3/27/2012 5:20 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: >>> Previously the code depends on the old RESTEasy libraries >>> provided by >>> Candlepin package. Now the Eclipse classpath, build/setup >>> scripts, and >>> the spec file have been updated to use the libraries provided >>> by the >>> new RESTEasy package. >>> >>> Ticket #29 >>> >>> Note: The new RESTEasy package is only available in F17. >> >> Rebased. > > I revised the patch such that in older Fedora it will not require > the new RESTEasy package. Instead, you can download RESTEasy > 2.3.2 (must be this version) zip file, install it somewhere, and > create the following symlinks to mimic F17: > > /usr/share/java/glassfish-jaxb/jaxb-impl.jar > /usr/share/java/resteasy/jaxrs-api.jar > /usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jaxb-provider.jar > /usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jaxrs.jar > /usr/share/java/resteasy/resteasy-jettison-provider.jar > /usr/share/java/scannotation.jar > > This way we can continue the development on F16 without having to > officially support it. > > I believe that you can download this from the following link (wait > for the download link to appear): > > * http://sourceforge.net/projects/resteasy/files/Resteasy%20JAX-RS/2.3.2.Fi... > > I believe that Kevin may be able to point you to an existing Repo for > the other components? > > Hope this helps, > -- Matt Matt, The only problem with this is that the nightly builds are using mock (as are the builds done in Westford, AFAIK). Mock builds just pull from a mock repo and don't allow you to do this type of manipulation--at least not in any type of automated fashion. If someone can provide me with an rpm that includes these hacks, I can put them in a extras repo and pull from that. This hack would allow me to continue with the daily F16 builds otherwise I think we should discontinue them since Dogtag 10 will never be released on F16. --Kevin

> > On 04/02/12 19:13, Adam Young wrote: >> Please make a single directory with the set of RPMs needed for >> BUilding Dogtag. We've been doing that for IPA for a while, and it >> is necessary for continuing development. I am not at a point where >> I can install F17 for my primary development machine, but I still >> try to keep up with PKI development from time to time. You guys >> have done a great job in geting the RPMS into Rawhide, but they >> should still install on F16 provided all of the dependencies are >> provided. I am willing to generate the Repo the same way that John >> Dennis does for IPA, but I need the RPMS themselves. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pki-devel mailing list >> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel >