Yes this has been on our wish list.
I only want to comment on the Access Control Considerations for profiles.
Please make sure the current security control in place is preserved. i.e. a
profile addition or update by an administrator requires an agent's approval
--
* update of an existing profile - agent disables the profile, admin then is
allowed to update, agent reviews the profile and enables it.
* adding a new profile - admin creates the profile, agent approves it
Christina
On 06/24/2014 12:07 AM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:00:25PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 03:12:05AM +0800, Ade Lee wrote:
>>>This is something that has been on the wishlist for awhile.
>>>There is no mechanism at this point to replicate profiles.
>>>
>>>I agree that we should start this design.
>>>
>>>Ade
>>>
>>LDAP Profile Storage Design proposal (work in progress) is up on the
>>wiki:
http://pki.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LDAP_Profile_Storage
>>
>>Input and feedback greatly appreciated, especially if anyone could
>>give guidance on the LDAP schema - I have no prior experience with
>>developing LDAP schemata.
>>
>>Have a nice weekend, all.
>>
>>Fraser
>>
>I've fleshed out the design proposal some more; getting close to
>ready now, modulo feedback and general approval.
>
>Particular sections for which I would appreciate feedback are:
>
>-
http://pki.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LDAP_Profile_Storage#Relationship_to_fi...
> - whether deletion of file-based profiles should be prohibited
> - whether a *restore profile* method is needed
>
>-
http://pki.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LDAP_Profile_Storage#LDAP_schema
> - Need feedback from people who understand LDAP schema better than
> I :)
>
>-
http://pki.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LDAP_Profile_Storage#Cloning
> - Need feedback from people who know more than me about the
> cloning process.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Fraser
>
>>>On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:44 +1000, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>>>>Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>A requirement from the FreeIPA side is the ability to add and
>>>>customise CA profiles. Dogtag's current profile creation behaviour
>>>>writes the new profile to the filesystem beside the standard
>>>>profiles (as well as making the appropriate update to the registry,
>>>>etc.)
>>>>
>>>>There does not seem to be a mechanism to distribute new/modified
>>>>profiles to replicas - though perhaps I have missed something.
>>>>
>>>>Because this behaviour is required, unless I have overlooked
>>>>something or there is a better way (in which case please shout out),
>>>>I think it makes sense to begin a design proposal for an LDAP-based
>>>>profile store.
>>>>
>>>>Finally, a brief mention of some tickets related to profile storage
>>>>that could be good to tackle simultaneously should the proposed
>>>>change go ahead:
>>>>
>>>>-
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/778
>>>>-
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4002
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Pki-devel mailing list
>>>>Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Pki-devel mailing list
>>Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
>_______________________________________________
>Pki-devel mailing list
>Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel