[PATCH] Fixes for Coverity Issues in categories : CALL_SUPER, UNCONFIRMEDCAST, DEAD_STORE, TOSTRING_ARRAY
1:27 p.m.
Please find attached the patch with fixes for some of the coverity
issues for review.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek
10:44 a.m.
Comments:
1. The fix in Resender.java is not correct - that is
replyRequestId.toString() is not the same as
replymsg.reqId.substring(index + 1). There are some conversions that
take place.
I'm OK with reverting your fix here, and marking the bug as
intentional/ignore.
2. In SelfTestSubsystem.java, remove the comments as well:
// strip preceding/trailing whitespace
// from passed-in String parameters
3. In CMCRevoke, no need to specify : String asciiBASE64Blob = null;
You can just specify String asciiBASE64Blob;
4. In Request.java, you can specify StringBuffer s = con.getPage();
5. In PKCS7.java, you need the new byte[] data = byte[len] in case
dis.available() == 0 . I'm not sure I like the way this method is
written. Lets revert the fix and leave this unfixed for now.
6. Can you explain to me why you think adding the Override tags will fix
the call_super issues?
Ade
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:27 -0400, Abhishek Koneru wrote:
Please find attached the patch with fixes for some of the coverity
issues for review.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
2:09 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] Fixes review comments on Patch Fixes for Coverity Issues in categories : CALL_SUPER, UNCONFIRMEDCAST, DEAD_STORE, TOSTRING_ARRAY
Please find attached the patch which contains fixes for review comments
given.
Smoke Test Passes.
Regards,
Abhishek Koneru
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 11:44 -0400, Ade Lee wrote:
Comments:
1. The fix in Resender.java is not correct - that is
replyRequestId.toString() is not the same as
replymsg.reqId.substring(index + 1). There are some conversions that
take place.
I'm OK with reverting your fix here, and marking the bug as
intentional/ignore.
2. In SelfTestSubsystem.java, remove the comments as well:
// strip preceding/trailing whitespace
// from passed-in String parameters
3. In CMCRevoke, no need to specify : String asciiBASE64Blob = null;
You can just specify String asciiBASE64Blob;
4. In Request.java, you can specify StringBuffer s = con.getPage();
5. In PKCS7.java, you need the new byte[] data = byte[len] in case
dis.available() == 0 . I'm not sure I like the way this method is
written. Lets revert the fix and leave this unfixed for now.
6. Can you explain to me why you think adding the Override tags will fix
the call_super issues?
Ade
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:27 -0400, Abhishek Koneru wrote:
> Please find attached the patch with fixes for some of the coverity
> issues for review.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Abhishek
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
8:41 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] Fixes review comments on Patch Fixes for Coverity Issues in categories : CALL_SUPER, UNCONFIRMEDCAST, DEAD_STORE, TOSTRING_ARRAY
Pushed to master (patches 7 and 8)
Ade
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 15:09 -0400, Abhishek Koneru wrote:
Please find attached the patch which contains fixes for review
comments
given.
Smoke Test Passes.
Regards,
Abhishek Koneru
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 11:44 -0400, Ade Lee wrote:
> Comments:
>
> 1. The fix in Resender.java is not correct - that is
> replyRequestId.toString() is not the same as
> replymsg.reqId.substring(index + 1). There are some conversions that
> take place.
>
> I'm OK with reverting your fix here, and marking the bug as
> intentional/ignore.
>
> 2. In SelfTestSubsystem.java, remove the comments as well:
> // strip preceding/trailing whitespace
> // from passed-in String parameters
>
> 3. In CMCRevoke, no need to specify : String asciiBASE64Blob = null;
> You can just specify String asciiBASE64Blob;
>
> 4. In Request.java, you can specify StringBuffer s = con.getPage();
>
> 5. In PKCS7.java, you need the new byte[] data = byte[len] in case
> dis.available() == 0 . I'm not sure I like the way this method is
> written. Lets revert the fix and leave this unfixed for now.
>
> 6. Can you explain to me why you think adding the Override tags will fix
> the call_super issues?
>
> Ade
>
>
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:27 -0400, Abhishek Koneru wrote:
> > Please find attached the patch with fixes for some of the coverity
> > issues for review.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Abhishek
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pki-devel mailing list
> > Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
4358
days inactive
4365
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Abhishek Koneru -
Ade Lee