12:56 a.m.
Hello,
We currently use SCEP for Cisco Routers with a RedHat CS.
However as far as we can tell, "CA Key Rollover" is not implemented.
Furthermore, we can't find any indication that it's implemented in in Dogtag 9 or
10.
Could anyone confirm this?
Does anyone work around this problem?
As far as we can see, few or no CA SW supports this, aside from the IOS CA from Cisco.
The SCEP RFC says that the other two PKIX standards for certificate management are
superior to SCEP, which has deficiencies, and is quasi-deprecated. Therefore my
assumption is, that no one (other than cisco) plans to invest any effort in expanding SCEP
support in Dogtag or any other opensource CA software.
Best regards,
William Elliott
10:11 a.m.
On 02/27/2013 10:56 PM, Elliott William C OSS sIT wrote:
Hello,
We currently use SCEP for Cisco Routers with a RedHat CS.
However as far as we can tell, "CA Key Rollover" is not implemented.
Furthermore, we can't find any indication that it's implemented in in Dogtag 9 or
10.
Could anyone confirm this?
Does anyone work around this problem?
As far as we can see, few or no CA SW supports this, aside from the IOS CA from Cisco.
The SCEP RFC says that the other two PKIX standards for certificate management are
superior to SCEP, which has deficiencies, and is quasi-deprecated. Therefore my
assumption is, that no one (other than cisco) plans to invest any effort in expanding SCEP
support in Dogtag or any other opensource CA software.
We are actually planning on
going through our existing SCEP
functionality to see what else from the Internet Draft should be
implemented in Dogtag 10.1. In addition, we have a few smaller tickets
related to SCEP in our Trac instance that we plan to look at (details at
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/).
We are not sure that we will be targeting "CA Key Rollover" specifically
any time soon, as we want to see if there are more common SCEP use cases
that should be targeted first. Is it specifically "CA Key Rollover" you
are interested in using, or is there anything else from the SCEP
Internet Draft that you have a use case for as well?
Thanks,
-NGK
Best regards,
William Elliott
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
2:56 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: pki-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
Nathan Kinder
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013 17:11
To: pki-users(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Pki-users] SCEP Support [bayes][heur]
On 02/27/2013 10:56 PM, Elliott William C OSS sIT wrote:
Hello,
We currently use SCEP for Cisco Routers with a RedHat CS.
However as far as we can tell, "CA Key Rollover" is not implemented.
Furthermore, we can't find any indication that it's implemented in in Dogtag 9 or
10.
Could anyone confirm this?
Does anyone work around this problem?
As far as we can see, few or no CA SW supports this, aside from the IOS CA from Cisco.
The SCEP RFC says that the other two PKIX standards for certificate management are
superior to SCEP, which has deficiencies, and is quasi-deprecated. Therefore my
assumption is, that no one (other than cisco) plans to invest any effort in expanding SCEP
support in Dogtag or any other opensource CA software.
We are actually planning on
going through our existing SCEP
functionality to see what else from the Internet Draft should be
implemented in Dogtag 10.1. In addition, we have a few smaller tickets
related to SCEP in our Trac instance that we plan to look at (details at
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/).
We are not sure that we will be targeting "CA Key Rollover" specifically
any time soon, as we want to see if there are more common SCEP use cases
that should be targeted first. Is it specifically "CA Key Rollover" you
are interested in using, or is there anything else from the SCEP
Internet Draft that you have a use case for as well?
[Elliott William OSS sIT]
We use a relatively short-lived CA (because of the depth of our pki hierarchy) which
requires CA certificate renewal after about 2-3 years. Furthermore, there are over a
thousand clients. Therefore the automatic renewal of the CA Certificate on the clients is
practically a must have for us (network managers want to ditch dogtag for IOS CA if they
have to manually update all clients).
As far as I can see, GetCACaps and GetNextCACert are the minimum that are needed for CA
rollover - maybe more.
Btw, the REST features look cool with v10.0.
Best regards,
Bill Elliott
Thanks,
-NGK
Best regards,
William Elliott
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
_______________________________________________
Pki-users mailing list
Pki-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
4070
days inactive
4074
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Elliott William C OSS sIT -
Nathan Kinder