On 01/23/2012 06:58 PM, Adam Young wrote:
I don't think that this is correct. There is functionality and critical bug fixing going on in the Dogtag 9 branch that we definitely want to get into master. It needs to get there somehow. Of course there may be work that is not needed on master due to refactoring, but that needs to be determined on a patch-by-patch basis.
If the concern is changes causing rebase headaches for Endi and Ade, then we could use a gatekeeper approach, but I haven't seen the need for that.
-NGK You've probably cleared this up, but: I think that chagnes going on in 9 are going to need formatting aligned with the Master branch before they can be pushed. Ade had suggested that the approach would involve formatting in the 9 series before pushing changes, but I am not sure if this is going to work across the board any way. I assume
On 01/19/2012 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: that fixes going into the 9 series wil lbe small enough patches that they can be had merged into master. Yes, we are just hand merging this stuff. We have not been reformatting on the 9 branch, and will avoid doing so.
_______________________________________________ Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel