[PATCH] 270 - features feature ..
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:56:40PM -0400, Ade Lee wrote:
Just the server and python client bits.
Ade
I think that we should store the config in LDAP so that a change on one replica is effected on clones. Obviously this is a fair bit more work I am OK with using CS.cfg initially but we should have this discussion. I will conduct a review of this patch and the Python lightweight-CAs patch on Monday. Cheers, Fraser
On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 12:25 +1000, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:56:40PM -0400, Ade Lee wrote:
Just the server and python client bits.
Ade
I think that we should store the config in LDAP so that a change on one replica is effected on clones. Obviously this is a fair bit more work I am OK with using CS.cfg initially but we should have this discussion.
Agreed that this is something we should discuss. Part of the reason this is system specific though is that people tend to update one system at a time -- in case something goes wrong. So you can very easily see a situation where a feature is available on one system but not another. Still, having it in LDAP would allow doing things like enabling features topology-wide for instance. Opening a ticket. https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/1634
I will conduct a review of this patch and the Python lightweight-CAs patch on Monday.
Cheers, Fraser
participants (2)
-
Ade Lee -
Fraser Tweedale