From: "Christina Fu" <cfu(a)redhat.com&gt; To: pki-devel(a)redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:25:49 PM Subject: Re: [Pki-devel] [pki-devel][PATCH] I compared this patch with the original C patch. There was a check in C that does not exist in your Java patch: 1019 if(data.size() != 3){ 1020 lifecycle = 0xf0; 1021 RA::Error(LL_PER_PDU, "RA_Processor::GetLifecycle", "apdu response is the wrong size, the size is: %x", data.size()); 1022 goto loser; 1023 } Why does it not apply in Java? Thanks, Christina On 11/15/2016 06:20 PM, John Magne wrote: Ticket: TPS throws "err=6" when attempting to format and e : https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/2544 Fix tested on standard card, it does what it is supposed to do. It checks first to make sure the lifecycle state needs to be changed before attempting to do so. This will prevent any cards that return an error when one tries to over write the value with the same value it had before. _______________________________________________ Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel _______________________________________________ Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel