_______________________________________________ Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel

Found a parsing error. This is the output that confirms that the code still works: old start = 934948800000 new start = 934985539332 differenceDays = 0 old end = 1337659200000 new end = 1337695939332 differenceDays = 0 instance Name old:R20111105101219 instance Name new:R20111105101219 date to z old:20111205101219Z date to z new:20111205101219Z old = 1021569630000 new = 1021569630334 old = 1021569630000 new = 1021569630334 Attached are the two files that produce that output; _______________________________________________ Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel

On 12/05/2011 11:19 PM, Ade Lee wrote: > Adam, > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but why is it that : > old start != new start > old_end != new end > old != new Because they only define the time down to the day, and it is stored as miliseconds, so the least significant bits are meaningless. Hence: differenceDays = 0 is the real test. I just tried to show my work how I got there. > > and shouldn't they be equal? > > Ade > > On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:19 -0500, Adam Young wrote: >> Found a parsing error. >> >> >> This is the output that confirms that the code still works: >> >> old start = 934948800000 >> new start = 934985539332 >> differenceDays = 0 >> old end = 1337659200000 >> new end = 1337695939332 >> differenceDays = 0 >> instance Name old:R20111105101219 >> instance Name new:R20111105101219 >> date to z old:20111205101219Z >> date to z new:20111205101219Z >> old = 1021569630000 >> new = 1021569630334 >> old = 1021569630000 >> new = 1021569630334 >> >> >> Attached are the two files that produce that output; >> _______________________________________________ >> Pki-devel mailing list >> Pki-devel(a)redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel >